Just thought I drop by and thank you for doing well, I’m not here to troll just as ai said to congratulate you Audirvana Team for doing such an amazing job with this amazin produc great job impressed, could not do withouth this amazin job software keep it up
6 Likes
if you are on windows yes I agree most of the time, but on macOS is a nightmare
Not in my experience…
1 Like
go and see my posts if none of those exist on your macOS system (impossible) let me know.
Your bugs are not mine…
A quick overview of my playback scenario… I am using Audirvāna Studio ver. 2.11.4 on macOS 15.7.1 running on a M2 Max Mac Studio with 64GB of memory (8GB playback preload RAM), library 6G SSD attached via USB 3.0 cable protocol (Isolated by an iFi-Audio iDefender 3.0 that truncates the USB bus power/ground/earth to the SSD, which is powered independently by a separate power-supply) … The DAC is fed via USB 3.0 PCIe controller housed in a Thunderbolt 3 PCIe expansion chassis, where the PCIe bus power is filtered by Elfidelity AXF-107 “Magician” PCIe card. The digital-audio signal is delivered by a short WireWorld USB 3.0 protocol cable, where it passes through an iFi-Audio iGalvanic 3.0 and output on a short 4-inch USB-C (USB-2.0 protocol) to the DAC… I modulate (up-sample) all PCM files to DSD in Audirvāna and utilize Studio EQ in concert with HRTF plug-in DSP, because I am headphone-centric… The playback is flawless… I don’t get hung-up on stuff that does not have anything to do with the playback quality… If I can find and play the file(s) then this is all that really matters to me.
1 Like
dude i dont speak about audio quality, i speak about UI issues, read again my post…come on
It’s all about audio-quality in my opinion… You responded to a general statement without being specific… and really out of context… You have made your gripes plain in the appropriate topics… this is not one of them.
1 Like
Studio is a tool not a toy. It works on MacOS just fine. Can it be improved? Of course. Send constructive comments to the company and if they make sense perhaps you will see them implemented.
But as stated before it’s about sound and Audirvana delivers better than anyone else. .
1 Like
This, 100% 
So it doesn’t have a glass-themed icon. Does it REALLY matter?
Does it sound any worse for this omission?
Oh, and ‘rounded/square’ corners to the main screen? Once again, does it REALLY matter?
Honestly @JohnnyFire, if you want the UI to appear exactly as you wish I’d suggest using XBMC instead, as you can tweak the look and feel to your hearts content. You’ll have what you want aesthetically, and can then complain that the sound quality isn’t up to the standard offered by Audirvana 
Also, I very rarely agree with @Agoldnear, but disparaging remarks aimed at him do you absolutely no favours son.
Peace 
3 Likes
Audirvana is doing miracles.
How about streaming 24 bit 192 khz to Chromecast Audio devices.
Yes it is maxing Chromecast Audio DAC which is actually 24 bit 192 khz and it is only limited by Google Chromecast software to 24/96
So I am first to discover this ?
Yes it is doing via UPNP DLNA
How this is possible ?
For Audirvana Developers I guess only sky is the limit.
I hope it is going to stay like this forever.
Guys do you own Chromecast Audio dongle ?
I was thinking that I am going to faint when I saw this at my friends place trying to convince him to buy or subscribe to Audirvana.
He is mostly analog .
So he tried Audirvana Studio with my help
Trial
Best Regards !
I have to correct myself.
Sorry to tell you just not fully confirmed action of Audirvana.
I noticed later, after I posted my last message that another software was running on the same Windows PC in the background which created open UPNP DLNA renderer for specific Chromecast Audio device.
Now Audirvana either Studio, Origin or older version is seeing this renderer and sending audio to it.
You can see this specific UPNP Chromecast Audio DLNA on usual Audirvana list of devices.
I am not writing here which software I used in the background because I do not want to get myself in trouble with Audirvana Forum Watch Keeper 
Unless is ok given to me by owners of this forum.
Best Regards !
You are sheeps of industry….. you have lost the point. but dreams are for those who can’t accept the truth, enjoy.
And you are completely off topic, behaving disrespectfully to other members on this forum and delusional in thinking that your highly subjective opinion about Audirvana is the general truth.
Courtesy is a 2 way street.
I have seen some previous posts from you with (imo completely trivial) complaints:
The ‘color of an icon’ and ‘rounded corners’ is a ‘nightmare’ in your opinion? Calling people who don’t agree with your complaints about these minor inconveniences sheeps of the industry?
Maybe you need a reality check or get some more perspective about what is really important. In the meantime.. enjoy your own biased ‘truth’ in your very own limited world.
3 Likes
…The myopia and off-topic presumptive-ness of this statement, brings me back to my original response to the insipidness of your first post here in this thread…
3 Likes
Can someone please remind me where the ‘ignore’ function is?
This w 
is really getting on my tits.
3 Likes
Will load an image because the chat here on iphone sucks, cant even see the button to post
See at the bottom of picture just a line of the button…
3 Likes
Thanks mate👍
1 Like