This is the problem we have stopped listening and started focussing on the software!
Me too Listening on 3.5
So I turned off metadata tagging and it took most of the day for Studio to analyze about 3.25TB. When finished I turned on the metadata tagging and there is no longer an āanalyzer progress barā showing the progress of metadata analysis. So I assume that now is occurring in the back round?
Several hours later and this analysis was still stuck and 100%.
When I restarted AS it didnāt start analysis again though. So at least that is good.
Can anyone write me when I have to wait for the analysis of audio files to finish? I have 360 albums of 5091 tracks. It never ends!
Your connection is slow???
just let it go⦠listen to music, stop looking at that bar 
What connection is this? If I talk about internet then 20 Mbps is enough. Or not? Yes, Iām listening to music and Iām happy, just when the analysis isnāt over, I canāt turn off the AS normally in the upper right. Thatās what Iām after. Should I leave NUC on non-stop for a few days to complete the analysis?
Internet connection yes⦠it reads a musicbrain info on web
to gives you more like biography of groupsā¦
Yes leave it open⦠not hard for a computer to stay open 1 or 2 days.
should not take more than a day i thinkā¦
my 40000 files took around 2.5 to 3 days if i remember when beta testingā¦
Ok Iāll try to leave NUC on day two and see. Thanks for the advice. Iāll let you know how it ends.
It will end when youāll pay your subscription fee. Thatās how it works. ![]()
If the analysis does not end by 16.6, I will not pay a euro. I still lack the remote control that almost everyone is waiting for.
I tried even to make it work even with the remote of Audirvana Plus 2.5, to no avail.
I think the analysis goes on in the background.
I think you can still play your music while that is occurring. At least on my system that is how it works.
The first (and last) rule of music management software.
āThou shalt not alter local music files without explicit user permissionā.
I am totally amazed this was allowed to happen.
True enough. I lucked out because the version I downloaded was 1.2, where the issue had been resolved.
My analyzing finished a few days ago and Now I open Audirvana and analyzing starts up again after I just added like 30 songs this is so dumb if it has to start over again just b/c I downloaded more songs I thought it would just analyze the new ones only but not including the entire folder once again
My analysis still doesnāt end after 3.5 days. Even the battery canāt last on the switch. Iām already nervous. I use battery power but it has a limited time so I donāt know how much more to wait? Is there anyone who has been waiting longer than 3-4 days? I only have about 5,000 tracks in the folder and it seems endless to me.
My analysis has also never stopped. It never finished on AS 1.0 so when I ran AS 1.1 I only put a small amount of my library on it due to the tagging issues. It analyzed quickly this time.
With the metadata tagging made optional I put my entire library on AS 1.2 and it has been analyzing ever since. I have Windows and 25,000 FLAC & WAV tracks.
Analysation of my local files has never completed since install, and must have run 6 or 7 times.
Yet like a fool I keep going back and trying, one more time!
If this is true, and anylastion runs every time new files are added to my local library then that really is the last straw for me.
It isnāt worth any more of my time Beta testing software that shouldāt have been released in itās current form.
Iāll probably keep looking on here to see if this problem persists over the coming months or whether a fix is finally issued. Problem is, without an increase in the trial period how will I know without subscribing?
Just for your comparison, analysis took around 7 days for my 38500 tracks, I didnāt leave AS running continuously, it was open for approx 8 hours each day while I was in the office listening and working. At the end of each day I shut down my mac.
When opening up AS a fresh it ālooksā like analysis is starting from the beginning but I really donāt think it is, judging by the timescales I saw, it probably does pick up from where it left off - unfortunately the progress bar doesnāt reflect this.
So, at some point it should complete the task, it seems to be slow for pretty much everyone, slower still for some. Does it matter much if we can still listen while its doing the analysis thing?
Once the initial analysis was complete I found adding a new album causes the usual synchronising (which seems a bit slower that with V3.5) followed by analysis of the new music, which is very quick for just one or two albums, maybe more so now as I opted out of the musicbrainz meta being added to local files once the option was there.