I hope you’re not complaining about the support we provide. 
1 Like
So a refund is out of question? 
Your up for sainthood mate👍🏻
1 Like
No refund for you!!
1 Like
Well let me know when you’re ready to release Studio 4.0 non subscription version, I’d be happy to purchase it. Drop the Radio and Podcast modules (as there seems little interest from the developers or users, fair enough)
With no additional content delivered only local files and streaming available just like the OG 3.5 there’s absolutely no need for a subscription imho.
I just don’t see the need for a redundancy in subscription fees especially when I see how great the Qobuz app is on Mac at least. Keep Damien’s secret sauce and quietly retire the bad aftertaste of poorly done radio implementation and redundant subscription fees.
1 Like
What?!? You should subscribe just to be part of this community.
Even those that complain, do this in a very amusing way. Some comments are hilarious. 
1 Like
Jokes aside, it’s just a question of perceived value. For some it’s worth it for others it’s not.
Audirvana can’t be all things to everybody. It’s good to have some competition from other vendors.
I did my year……made parole, studio free in 2023!
Grandfathered in by 3.5 for now, just suggesting that they should play to their strong attributes…….as you say can’t be everything to everyone. Radio, Podcast and network upnp is definitely the weak side play. You will require some real depth of talent manpower and finance to play with Roon, BluOs and other hardware providers.
Seems like a good idea with origin now follow up 3.5 properly, I can’t wait 
Not holding my breath on it 
1 Like
Major discovery this evening (July 16, 2022) with my version of Audirvana 3.5.50 (3580)!
I continue to have issues with TIDAL streaming as some track are fine but most return errors (as documented earlier in this thread).
I am subscribed to TIDAL HiFi Plus and when things work with Audirvana, files are streamed in highest quality, including MQA.
Under the Audirvana Streaming TIDAL Account settings, my account is shown as “HiFi” (no “Plus” shown). There are four(4) choices for “Limit streaming quality to.” that are: Low/High/Lossless/Master. Of course, I have always used the “Master” setting as the best fit for my TIDAL HiFi Plus account.
As an experiment, I set this option to “High” to see if it made a difference. To my surprise, every track I selected (including one that would not load before with the “Master” setting) streamed without a problem! Of course, the file format was depracated and shown as AAC.
So the difficulty with my installation of 3.5.50 would appear to be with the the choice selected for the “Limit streaming quality to” setting.
Audirvana is not really useful to me if I cannot access TIDAL streaming at the full resolution I am subscribed to!
Hopefully this may give Audirvana support a valuable hint as to why so many people are having intermittent performance streaming TIDAL.
As I have stated before, I have been considering moving to Studio but am reluctant to make a new commitment if support isn’t willing or able to keep their existing software running properly. This doesn’t give confidence that Studio will not suffer the same neglect eventually.
I hope technical support can find a permanent solution for 3.5 and would then likely move to a Studio subscription for the added features.
JWH
1 Like
That can‘t happen with the subscription model. If it does, people will just stop the subscription. With the old licensing model you ponied money in advance for indefinite use in time (as long as it works). The manufacturer has no incentive to support it indefinitely.
The old version has been discontinued for more than a year, and they even released few maintenance versions.
In another thread it seems They are aware of the issue and are waiting on Tidal to resolve as it seems to be a tidal caused issue: No MQA / Masters Streaming with Tidal Anymore - #12 by Antoine
Just chiming in to say that nothing’s changed. Tidal playback is still dicey at best and I’m still a once Audirvana evangelist turned sour about a product that doesn’t work as advertised. I’m also not trying to spark another conversation about the whys; It’s been ‘broken’ for far too long.
1 Like
This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.